Dyno'd
3/24/10, 04:36 PM
#1
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
Dyno'd
Last edited by Topnotch; 3/24/10 at 04:38 PM.
3/24/10, 04:39 PM
#3
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
3/24/10, 04:41 PM
#4
Banned
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It definitely is, here is there 2010 GT500 test:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxDS6PLubgY
511, no way.
Their GT500 reads about 45 higher than realistic. Take for what it's worth. I want to see Dynonet and Mustang Dyno #s.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxDS6PLubgY
511, no way.
Their GT500 reads about 45 higher than realistic. Take for what it's worth. I want to see Dynonet and Mustang Dyno #s.
3/24/10, 04:45 PM
#6
Banned
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 15% thing is BS because all dynos rate differently. My car read 441 on an MD-1100 Mustang Dyno, 480 on a Dynojet 224xLC, and 501 on a Dyno Dynamics. All SAE.
Dynos are tuning tools, not verifiers of factory horsepower.
3/24/10, 04:46 PM
#7
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It definitely is, here is there 2010 GT500 test:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxDS6PLubgY
511, no way.
Their GT500 reads about 45 higher than realistic. Take for what it's worth. I want to see Dynonet and Mustang Dyno #s.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxDS6PLubgY
511, no way.
Their GT500 reads about 45 higher than realistic. Take for what it's worth. I want to see Dynonet and Mustang Dyno #s.
3/24/10, 04:47 PM
#8
Banned
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The best comparo would be a 2010 and 2011 GT making back to back runs on the same dyno, same day.
3/24/10, 04:48 PM
#11
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry, I posted before reading your last post. I see what you're saying, now. I was unaware that there were so many different figures wrought from such a variety of dynos.
3/24/10, 05:03 PM
#13
Cobra R Member
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd imagine a solid 375RWHP or so on a Mustang Dyno. I'd have to agree that from what I've normally seen the 224xLC has a lot of 'higher than what you'd expect' - if you will... outputs.
Hence why we're all shocked.
Hence why we're all shocked.
3/24/10, 05:19 PM
#15
Cobra R Member
Join Date: September 11, 2009
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea for sure, the 1100 series is pretty stout. And the 1750 is also a nice unit from what I've heard. But yea, at the end of the day, not putting a lot of backing on this particular instance, but nice find once again Topnotch! 
3/24/10, 05:54 PM
#17
V6 Member
According to this article it was a Dynojet 248. How does that compare to the Dynojet 224xLC eci?
http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...t-50.html#more
http://blogs.insideline.com/straight...t-50.html#more
Last edited by 1969 Boss429; 3/24/10 at 06:38 PM.
3/24/10, 07:05 PM
#20
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe Ford underrated it to leave room for the Boss? Edmunds' dyno is usually a little on the high side but I'm guessing that's 375 rwhp on a regular Dynojet. I just don't see any chance for a Camaro SS at this point stock on stock. Would it be childish to say in your face at this point?