2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang

Wasn't just the Mustang that didn't lose weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4/20/14, 06:27 PM
  #1  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
Dave07997S's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't just the Mustang that didn't lose weight

Turns out the new M3/4 didn't lose as much weight as promised either.

http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=974479

It looks to be only about 80lbs lighter than the out going E92 M3.
Old 4/20/14, 06:46 PM
  #2  
Cobra Member
 
Ethanjbeau's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 12, 2010
Location: MA (north shore)
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought the mustangs weight hasn't been announced as of yet?
Old 4/20/14, 07:04 PM
  #3  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
Dave07997S's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ethanjbeau
I thought the mustangs weight hasn't been announced as of yet?
True, but the scuttlebutt is it didn't lose that much or any weight to the outgoing model.

If I am premature sorry...

Dave
Old 4/20/14, 07:18 PM
  #4  
Bullitt Member
 
knk11stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 23, 2010
Location: Harrisburg,Pa.
Posts: 251
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Yeah I'll wait till I see the official specs! Thought I heard 200lbs.
Old 4/20/14, 08:46 PM
  #5  
Mach 1 Member
Thread Starter
 
Dave07997S's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sorry mistake

Last edited by Dave07997S; 4/21/14 at 02:11 PM.
Old 4/20/14, 10:30 PM
  #6  
Member
 
pj.singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 24, 2011
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave07997S
Turns out the new M3/4 didn't lose as much weight as promised either.

http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=974479

It looks to be only about 80lbs lighter than the out going E92 M3.
yea i was disappointed with the f80 as well. planning on canceling my order, selling my 335i and going for the 50th anniversary
Old 4/21/14, 06:38 AM
  #7  
Bullitt Member
 
knk11stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 23, 2010
Location: Harrisburg,Pa.
Posts: 251
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by pj.singh
yea i was disappointed with the f80 as well. planning on canceling my order, selling my 335i and going for the 50th anniversary
Good luck getting your hands on a 50th anniversary!
Old 4/21/14, 06:43 AM
  #8  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 28 Likes on 21 Posts
I hope I'm wrong but I've been saying I can't see how the new mustang would lose any weight. At this point I'm just hoping it didn't gain any. But again hopefully I'm wrong, time will tell.
Old 4/21/14, 11:29 AM
  #9  
Member
 
pj.singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 24, 2011
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pj.singh
yea i was disappointed with the f80 as well. planning on canceling my order, selling my 335i and going for the 50th anniversary
i mean high selling dealers should be getting allocations. and ken grody ford - buena park is near me. talked to a sales agent and he said he will get his hands on 1 of the 3 they are ordering for me he tried convincing me for a stage 3 roush 2014 mustang too hahaha. test drove it and **** it's one hell of a car
Old 4/21/14, 11:34 AM
  #10  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by pj.singh
yea i was disappointed with the f80 as well. planning on canceling my order, selling my 335i and going for the 50th anniversary

Or save your pennies for the GT350, if you were going for the M3 it seems like that would be more your style.


The anniversary car is pretty cool but its a dolled up Mustang GT, probably good as a collector's item but if high performance is your thing the GT350 will better serve your needs.
Old 4/21/14, 11:49 AM
  #11  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave07997S
True, but the scuttlebutt is it didn't lose that much or any weight to the outgoing model.

If I am premature sorry...

Dave

That's what I'm thinking. Ford isn't crowing about a lighter weight Mustang. I'd be shocked if they were able to pull a substantial amount of weight out of the new car if at all.


Frankly I wont be all that disappointed if the new car comes in around the weight of the out going car. Lighter would be nice but +/- 3600 pounds wouldn't be all that bad given the increased level of equipment.
Old 4/21/14, 11:58 AM
  #12  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 28 Likes on 21 Posts
That's what I'm saying.
Old 4/21/14, 12:03 PM
  #13  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Getportfolio's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 7, 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,473
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
I'm sure the mustang lost plenty of weight. The main proof is the excess fenders that were drastically trimmed to forcefully shove that engine in.
Old 4/21/14, 12:07 PM
  #14  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by Getportfolio
I'm sure the mustang lost plenty of weight. The main proof is the excess fenders that were drastically trimmed to forcefully shove that engine in.
But add the wider body, bigger brakes/wheels/tires, IRS, beefier subframe and pillars, I bet it'll be +/- 80 pounds to an equivalent 2014.
Old 4/21/14, 04:04 PM
  #15  
 
rhumb's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While the 200lb meme was floated about early on, in line with broader FoMoCo proclamations about seriously trimming the fat off their vehicles, that they've been noticably reticent about saying anything regarding weight belies that they probable trimmed little to none in actuality.

As for the M3/4, I think there is an apples and oranges comparisons problem, that people are comparing a more loaded 2014 to a relatively unloaded 2014 and saying little savings was actually done. I think if compared apples to apples, BMW did manage to shave close to 200lbs off a comparable 2015. I think...
Old 4/21/14, 05:08 PM
  #16  
Member
 
pj.singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 24, 2011
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bob
Or save your pennies for the GT350, if you were going for the M3 it seems like that would be more your style.


The anniversary car is pretty cool but its a dolled up Mustang GT, probably good as a collector's item but if high performance is your thing the GT350 will better serve your needs.
that was the original plan, but things came up and i wont have a spare car for too long. so need a car sometime within the next few months. so the 50th year anniversary and m3 were the choices available. both great cars but the 5.0 v8 that the mustang has is more desirable than the inline 6 in the new m3s. better than the inline 6 in my car but still. i need v8 hahaha.

regardless of high performance i have some plans for it. the 700hp whipple kit, kws, some solid wheels, and a few other things to make it special
Old 4/21/14, 05:14 PM
  #17  
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
SONICBOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 17, 2006
Location: Temecula,CA
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
More special ;-)^^
Old 4/21/14, 05:50 PM
  #18  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by pj.singh
that was the original plan, but things came up and i wont have a spare car for too long. so need a car sometime within the next few months. so the 50th year anniversary and m3 were the choices available. both great cars but the 5.0 v8 that the mustang has is more desirable than the inline 6 in the new m3s. better than the inline 6 in my car but still. i need v8 hahaha. regardless of high performance i have some plans for it. the 700hp whipple kit, kws, some solid wheels, and a few other things to make it special
Why would you do that to a 50the Edition? Just buy a fricken regular one. This^ is the exact market I was afraid of this car attracting....
Old 4/21/14, 09:14 PM
  #19  
Member
 
pj.singh's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 24, 2011
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by laserred38
Why would you do that to a 50the Edition? Just buy a fricken regular one. This^ is the exact market I was afraid of this car attracting....
im not gonna chop it up like many people in the BMW community are doing to their cars these days. just trying to get it a little bit quicker. i respect a nice clean looking car. 50th anniversary is gonna be a hell of a car. all original. so messing with it would be just stupid
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ecostang
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1661
11/3/22 08:50 PM
jc46002003
Repair and Service Help
70
4/15/16 03:00 PM
ssjbuu
Repair and Service Help
6
8/28/15 08:55 AM
MRGTX
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
5
7/21/15 02:08 PM
carid
Vendor Showcase
3
7/17/15 05:40 PM



Quick Reply: Wasn't just the Mustang that didn't lose weight



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 PM.