Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

damb ignorance (**** ignorance!)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5/1/10, 06:06 PM
  #21  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Ltngdrvr
And D.A.M.B. stands for Direct Acting Mechanical Bucket which sounds to me as if it is a solid unit, no hydraulics to it.
That's what I get for guessing about the 3.7. So how do they provide for/adjust clearance?
Old 5/1/10, 06:08 PM
  #22  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by cdynaco
That's what I get for guessing about the 3.7. So how do they provide for/adjust clearance?
Don't know, haven't seen any service info for it yet.
Old 5/1/10, 06:15 PM
  #23  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Found this off a Tacoma site after googling. Surely they didn't go back to shims?

The valve train is a direct acting mechanical bucket (DAMB) valve train. It does not have a hydraulic lash adjuster. They eventually need to be adjusted. They vary the thickness of buckets or shims under the buckets. Very simple and stiff valve train, kinda noisy though....
Old 5/1/10, 06:45 PM
  #24  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think that the buckets are machined to tolerance before they are assembled on the motor so no shims are used.
Old 5/1/10, 07:09 PM
  #25  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
So in time after the valves go out of adjustment, you would buy new buckets of varying thicknesses?

No engine can escape changing valve tolerances.
Old 5/1/10, 07:36 PM
  #26  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
Rabbi Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 10, 2010
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ltngdrvr
The fewer parts the better generally but there are pros and cons to both.
Cool . . . you guys know stuff! Great info!

Are roller-finger followers the same as roller tappets? I remember when I was a kid, Ford was using them on Mustang engines in the '80s/'90s (?) . . . it sounded really cool!

But it seems like they're not a big deal anymore except with racing types . . . ?
Old 5/1/10, 08:02 PM
  #27  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Rabbi Mike
Are roller-finger followers the same as roller tappets? I remember when I was a kid, Ford was using them on Mustang engines in the '80s/'90s (?) . . . it sounded really cool!
The followers on the 2V, 3V and 4V ford OHC motors ride under the cam and are supported on one end by a hydraulic lash adjuster and the other end sits on top of the valve stem. As the cam turns it pushes down on the follower and it pushes down on the valve. The lash adjuster serves a similar function to the hydraulics in the old style hydraulic lifter.
Old 5/1/10, 08:06 PM
  #28  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Rabbi Mike
Cool . . . you guys know stuff! Great info!

Are roller-finger followers the same as roller tappets? I remember when I was a kid, Ford was using them on Mustang engines in the '80s/'90s (?) . . . it sounded really cool!

But it seems like they're not a big deal anymore except with racing types . . . ?
Hmmm. I'm not familiar with roller-finger followers. I remember roller cams which used roller (ball) bearings between the camshaft and the cam bore in the block (OHV) or head (OHC) as the case may be. Roller bearings have very little friction as compared to the standard 'bearings' - which are really just bushings like crank & connecting rod bearings/bushings.

I think the roller tappets had bearings in the rocker arms of push rod engines. Maybe others know more on that.

The finger followers extend the reach of the cam lobe. It is what allows the ingenious 3V with a SOHC. The cam sits between the intake and exhaust valve banks while the fingers reach the valve stems. It allowed a multi-valve head design with less rotating mass of a typical DOHC design.

Enlarge this pic of the 4.6 3V SOHC head. At this angle, you can see the two intake finger followers extending out from under the cam lobes and resting on top of the intake valves.



From what I understand for the 5.0 4V DOHC, finger followers were used to allow flexibility in the placement of the cams for the purpose of head design for better placement/angle of the intake ports to the combustion chamber for purposes of flow.

Prior to using finger followers, the intake and exhaust cams had to be placed directly in line with the respective valve banks.

Last edited by cdynaco; 5/1/10 at 08:07 PM.
Old 5/1/10, 08:28 PM
  #29  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Hmmm. I'm not familiar with roller-finger followers. I remember roller cams which used roller (ball) bearings between the camshaft and the cam bore in the block (OHV) or head (OHC) as the case may be. Roller bearings have very little friction as compared to the standard 'bearings' - which are really just bushings like crank & connecting rod bearings/bushings.

I think the roller tappets had bearings in the rocker arms of push rod engines. Maybe others know more on that.

The finger followers extend the reach of the cam lobe. It is what allows the ingenious 3V with a SOHC. The cam sits between the intake and exhaust valve banks while the fingers reach the valve stems. It allowed a multi-valve head design with less rotating mass of a typical DOHC design.

Enlarge this pic of the 4.6 3V SOHC head. At this angle, you can see the two intake finger followers extending out from under the cam lobes and resting on top of the intake valves.



From what I understand for the 5.0 4V DOHC, finger followers were used to allow flexibility in the placement of the cams for the purpose of head design for better placement/angle of the intake ports to the combustion chamber for purposes of flow.

Prior to using finger followers, the intake and exhaust cams had to be placed directly in line with the respective valve banks.
The followers in the 3 valve have a roller in the middle that rides against the cam lobes, I believe the 2 valve and 4 valve use similar ones.

The finger followers are inherent to the modular engine family design. It's not that they were used to allow the cams to be placed differently in the head it is the fact that they were part of the engine design that allowed the engineers to move the cams.

The followers are sort of like rocker arms in a pushrod motor, they just don't have to have a pushrod and the rock from the lash adjuster end instead of rocking from the middle.

Look at the followers in this picture, they are on the rag above the cams in this pic, you can see the rollers in the middle of them.


Last edited by Ltngdrvr; 5/1/10 at 08:30 PM.
Old 5/1/10, 08:44 PM
  #30  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here's a pic of a follower from a 2 valve motor, 3 valve and 4 valve are basically the same, just a little different length, the end with the hole goes on top of the lash adjuster.

Old 5/1/10, 08:51 PM
  #31  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Ltngdrvr
Look at the followers in this picture, they are on the rag above the cams in this pic, you can see the rollers in the middle of them.

Thanx! I assumed the finger followers rested on a non-centered pivot in the head with the lash adjuster underneath the follower on one end, and with the other end of the follower reaching to the valve stem (sort of like a non-centered teeter totter), and the cam acted directly on the follower itself (no roller) like a cam cup/bucket follower.

So does the roller have a bearing inside it? Or does it simply roll on a shaft?

Where is the lash adjuster placed?

Are the intake fingers the same length as the exhaust? (i.e. is the cam centered between intake and exhaust valves?)

Last edited by cdynaco; 5/1/10 at 08:54 PM.
Old 4/20/14, 10:07 AM
  #32  
Member
 
Danie|'s Avatar
 
Join Date: April 20, 2014
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much easier would be with this one:
Old 4/21/14, 01:59 PM
  #33  
Cobra Member
 
TheReaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 27, 2007
Location: Southern Al
Posts: 1,496
Received 26 Likes on 22 Posts
Holy thread resurrection Batman!!!!!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
radio
2010-2014 Mustang
24
9/17/16 03:37 PM
junkman9096
'10-14 Interior and Audio
5
5/12/16 12:43 AM
robjh22
GT Performance Mods
13
8/28/15 12:17 PM
A-Rex
Fox Mustangs
23
5/16/05 02:28 PM



Quick Reply: damb ignorance (**** ignorance!)



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:40 PM.